The knock-on effect Anderson deal could have on midfielder market this summer

Elliot Anderson’s £116 million move to Manchester City from Nottingham Forest is more than a headline-grabbing transfer—it’s a seismic shift in the midfield market this summer. The deal, agreed in principle and awaiting a medical, instantly recalibrates expectations for every club still hunting in that position. With Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester United and Tottenham all targeting at least one central midfielder, the Anderson valuation will act as the new benchmark. Newcastle’s refusal to sell Sandro Tonali for £80 million last week already reflected Forest’s £35 million purchase of Anderson in January 2024; now City’s outlay underscores how quickly the floor has risen.

How the Anderson fee resets the midfield market

The £116 million price tag isn’t just a headline number—it’s a reference point. Clubs pursuing midfielders will now measure every target against Anderson’s valuation, particularly those with three years or fewer left on their contracts. Tonali, whose Newcastle valuation was £80 million a fortnight ago, now faces a £36 million gap to Anderson’s fee, giving the Magpies leverage to resist Spurs’ advances. Arsenal, who have long monitored Tonali, must decide whether to bridge that disparity or pivot to alternatives like Bruno Guimarães or Alex Scott. Manchester City, fresh from landing Anderson, may still join the chase for Tonali, but their internal restructuring—potential departures of İlkay Gündoğan and Rodri’s future uncertainty—could temper ambition.

Liverpool’s interest in Mateus Fernandes also enters a new phase. The £116 million marker raises the bar for Portuguese midfielders, forcing the Reds to weigh whether Fernandes’ profile justifies a fee closer to Anderson’s than to recent deals like João Neves’ £100 million valuation. Manchester United, meanwhile, face a dual challenge: balancing their own midfield recruitment with the financial ripple effect of City’s spending. The Anderson deal proves that elite clubs are willing to pay premium prices for young, England-qualified midfielders, a trend that will tighten budgets elsewhere.

Forest’s gamble pays off, but the window isn’t closed

For Nottingham Forest, the Anderson sale caps a two-year project that began with a £35 million outlay and ends with a £116 million profit. The club’s ability to turn an £81 million profit on a player who arrived from Newcastle in January 2024 underscores Forest’s sharp business sense. Yet the windfall arrives as Forest prepare for life without a key creative hub. Anderson’s departure leaves a void that Forest will struggle to fill internally; their remaining midfield options—likely a blend of academy graduates like Joe Gardner and loan returnees—lack the profile to command similar fees. Forest’s next transfer cycle will hinge on reinvesting that capital wisely, lest they regress to the pre-Anderson era.

City, by contrast, add a player who has already proven himself in major tournaments. Anderson’s starring role in England’s Under-21 European Championship triumph last summer, followed by his senior debut and World Cup appearances, aligns with Pep Guardiola’s preference for technically gifted, versatile midfielders. His ability to operate as a single pivot or in a double pivot gives City tactical flexibility, a luxury that few midfielders can match. Forest’s loss is City’s gain, but the ripple effect extends beyond the Etihad Stadium.

What comes next for the chasing clubs

Arsenal’s pursuit of Guimarães now faces a critical test. Newcastle’s reluctance to sell Tonali at £80 million suggests they will demand a premium for Guimarães, whose own contract expires in 2028. If Arsenal refuse to match City’s valuation, they may turn to Scott or a cheaper domestic option like Curtis Jones, risking a midfield that still lacks a true metronome. Tottenham, meanwhile, could press harder for Tonali, banking on Antonio Conte’s preference for ball-playing midfielders. Liverpool’s Fernandes deal could hinge on whether they view him as a long-term partner for Szoboszlai or a short-term fix; the Anderson fee makes the latter option less palatable.

Manchester United’s situation is thornier. With a new stadium project overcoming a key hurdle, the club must decide whether to splurge on a marquee midfielder or prioritise defensive upgrades like Gonçalo Inácio. The Anderson deal raises the stakes: if United fail to land a top-tier midfielder, their title ambitions could stall before the transfer window even closes. City’s move forces United to confront a harsh reality—elite midfielders are no longer bargains, and waiting for prices to drop may mean missing out entirely.

For England, Anderson’s move is a statement of intent. His World Cup focus remains undimmed, according to teammate Jarell Quansah, who insists Anderson’s priority is lifting the trophy with the Three Lions. That clarity should reassure City, who are adding a player with the temperament to thrive under pressure. Yet the transfer’s wider impact is already being felt across the Premier League, where midfield has become the most contested battleground of the summer.

As clubs scramble to adapt, one truth is clear: the Anderson deal wasn’t just a transfer—it was a market reset. Every subsequent midfield move this summer will be measured against £116 million, and those who misjudge the new normal will pay the price.

Related coverage

World Cup news latest: England’s Elliot Anderson set for British-record move to Manchester City – Sky News · Anderson’s £130m City move ends Forest’s Anderson era